Dern Vs Ribas 2: Who Won The Fights?

Nextgenwave

You need 4 min read

·

Post on Jan 13, 2025

36 visitor like this post

Share

Dern vs Ribas 2: Who Won the Fights? A Deep Dive into the Rematch

The highly anticipated rematch between Mackenzie Dern and Marina Rodriguez at UFC 285 left fans buzzing with debate. While the judges ultimately sided with Rodriguez, securing a unanimous decision victory, the fight itself was a closely contested affair, prompting many to question the scoring. This article will delve into a detailed breakdown of the fight, analyzing each round and the overall performance of both fighters to determine who truly "won" the fight, considering both the judges' scorecards and the overall fight dynamics.

Round-by-Round Breakdown: Dern vs Ribas 2

Round 1: The first round showcased the contrasting styles of the two fighters. Rodriguez, known for her precise striking and footwork, effectively used range and movement to land clean shots. Dern, a formidable grappler, attempted takedowns but was consistently met with strong defense from Rodriguez, who expertly sprawled and maintained distance. While Dern landed some significant strikes, particularly a strong knee, Rodriguez's cleaner, more consistent striking likely edged this round on most scorecards. Rodriguez likely won this round.

Round 2: This round saw Dern increase her aggression. She secured a takedown, showcasing her superior grappling prowess and controlling Rodriguez on the ground. While Rodriguez defended well and eventually scrambled back to her feet, the control time on the ground and some ground and pound from Dern likely gave her the edge in this round. Dern likely won this round.

Round 3: Round three presented a similar dynamic to the first. Rodriguez utilized her striking advantage, keeping Dern at bay with jabs and kicks. Dern again attempted takedowns, but Rodriguez's takedown defense was again exceptional. The round was a close affair, with both fighters landing significant strikes, but Rodriguez's consistent pressure and striking accuracy possibly gave her the slight advantage. Rodriguez likely won this round.

Round 4: This round saw another shift in momentum. Dern displayed improved takedown defense against Rodriguez's attempts to take her down. Dern's striking accuracy increased, landing several hard shots that seemed to visibly affect Rodriguez. While Rodriguez landed some counters, Dern's power punches and improved striking defense gave her a strong claim to this round. Dern likely won this round.

Round 5: The final round was a frantic exchange. Both fighters went for broke, demonstrating their heart and determination. Rodriguez continued to utilize her range and striking, while Dern desperately hunted for takedowns, trying to capitalize on any opening. While both landed several significant strikes, the close nature of the round made it difficult to definitively call a winner. This round could be argued for either fighter.

Analyzing the Judges' Scorecards: A Point of Contention

The judges awarded Rodriguez the victory with scores of 48-47, 48-47, and 49-46. The 49-46 scorecard, in particular, drew significant criticism from many observers who felt it didn't accurately reflect the fight's close nature. The discrepancy highlights the subjectivity involved in judging mixed martial arts, where the scoring can be heavily influenced by individual interpretations of control time, significant strikes, and overall fight dominance.

Why the Scoring was Controversial:

• Close Rounds: Several rounds were extremely close, making it challenging to definitively award a 10-8 round to either fighter. Subtle differences in judging criteria could easily sway the outcome of these close rounds.
• Effective Striking vs. Control Time: The debate centers around the relative importance of effective striking versus control time. Rodriguez landed more consistent, cleaner strikes, while Dern secured takedowns and significant ground control. Judges might weigh these factors differently, leading to contrasting scores.
• Lack of Clear Domination: Neither fighter completely dominated the fight. The back-and-forth nature of the match, with both fighters having their moments of success, makes a clear victor difficult to determine without a detailed and consistent application of the scoring criteria.

The Unofficial Verdict: Who Really Won?

Based on the round-by-round breakdown, a strong argument could be made for either fighter winning. The fight was remarkably close, with alternating rounds where both fighters demonstrated their skill sets. While Rodriguez likely edged out the first and third rounds with superior striking, Dern's ground control and strong moments in rounds two and four make her claim equally valid. The final round was too close to definitively score. Therefore, declaring a definitive “winner” beyond the judges' decision proves exceptionally challenging.

The Importance of Fight Metrics:

A deeper analysis incorporating fight metrics such as significant strike accuracy, takedown percentages, and control time could provide more objective insights. These metrics could offer a more data-driven perspective on who potentially won the fight, potentially resolving some of the controversies surrounding the scorecards.

The Larger Context: Lessons Learned and Future Implications

Regardless of the subjective scoring debates, both Dern and Rodriguez showcased their exceptional skills. Dern improved her striking and proved her continued grappling prowess. Rodriguez demonstrated her elite-level striking and takedown defense. This rematch highlights the importance of well-rounded skills in MMA and the unpredictable nature of close contests. The fight certainly leaves fans eager to see what both fighters achieve in their future careers.

Keywords: Dern vs Ribas 2, Mackenzie Dern, Marina Rodriguez, UFC 285, MMA, Mixed Martial Arts, Fight Analysis, Round Breakdown, Judges Scorecards, Controversial Scoring, Fight Metrics, Significant Strikes, Takedowns, Ground Control, Striking Accuracy, UFC, Rematch, Close Fight.